SalafiTalk.Net
SalafiTalk.Net » Affairs of Manhaj
» The Reality Of Jamiat Ahle-Hadith UK
Search ===>




Part 1Part 2Part 3Part 4Part 5Part 6Part 7Part 8Part 9 • Part 10 • Part 11 • Part 12


   Reply to this Discussion Start new discussion << previous || next >> 
Posted By Topic: The Reality Of Jamiat Ahle-Hadith UK -- page: 1 2 3

book mark this topic Printer-friendly Version  send this discussion to a friend  new posts last

spubs.com
09-17-2006 @ 12:56 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Administrator
Posts: 846
Joined: Sep 2002
          


THE "JAMIAT AHL-E-HADITH" AIDING IN THE DESTRUCTION OF THE RELIGION?

Abdul-Hadi Omari stated:

quote:
"..In every school of thought for their great Scholars, such as Shabir Ahmad Uthmaanee, who was a GREAT SCHOLAR of the religion from the Deobandee school of thought. He has written some small commentaries of the Qur'aan and other good works.

Also, AHMAD REZA KHAN from the BRELAWEE school of thought, who was a GREAT SCHOLAR of the religion who has written many books.

Likewise, we have Sayyid Abu A'laa Mawdudi, who was a very great scholar of the religion, rather he was the founder of JAMAT-E-ISLAMI, and has written a VERY GOOD and detailed explanation of the Qur'aan known as 'Tahfeemul-Qur'aan' and he has written many other books which have reached an international level, and of them are those which are FINAL REFERENCE POINTS for their particular topics...

...So all of these VERY, VERY GREAT SCHOLARS, then may Allaah be pleased with them all and may Allaah fill their graves with noor (light).."

(Recorded from a live broadcast across Birmingham on 'Radio Ramadan')



SCHOLARLY RESPONSE FROM AN IMAAM OF THE SALAF:
AL-IMAAM, AL-HAAFIDH, SHAYKHUL-ISLAAM:
MUHAMMAD BIN ASLAM AL-KHURASAANEE AT-TOOSEE*
(Died 242 AH)

Shaikhul-Islaam Muhammad Ibn Aslam at-Toosee (died 242), rahimahullaah, stated:

quote:
"Whosoever honours, gives respect to or venerates a person of bid'ah, then indeed he has aided in the destruction of the Religion"

(Ibn Waddaah, no. 120, Aboo Shaamah, no. 36.)


* And he is is the Imaam, the Haafidh, the learned and nurturing Scholar, Shaykhul-Islaam, Muhammad ibn Aslam al-Kurasaanee at-Toosee. From those he took knowledge from: Yazeed ibn Haaroon, Ya'la ibn 'Ubaid and his brother, Muhammad ibn 'Ubaid, Aboo 'Abdir-Rahmaan al-Muqree, Husayn ibnul-Waleed an-Naisaabooree, 'Abdul-Hakam ibn Maisarah the companion of Ibn Juraij, Yahyah ibn Abee Bukayr. And he has compiled a "Musnad" and "Al-Arba'een" and other than that.

From those who narrated from him: Ibraaheem Ibn Abee Taalib, the Imaam of the Imaams Ibn Khuzaimah, Aboo Bakr Ibn Abee Daawood, Muhammad Ibn Wakee' at-Toosee, Zanjawaih ibn Muhammad and others.

Ishaaq ibn Raahawaih (died 238AH) said, regarding the hadeeth: "Indeed Allaah will not unite the Ummah of Muhammad (salallaahu 'alaihi wassallam) upon misguidance. And when you see the differing, then obligatory upon you is the Main Body (as-Suwaadul-A'dham)."

So a man said [to Ishaaq ibn Raahawaih]: "O Aboo Ya'qoob! Who is the Main Body (as-Suwaadul-A'dham)? He replied: "Muhammad ibn Aslam and his companions and whoever follows him!"

Then Ishaaq ibn Raahawaih said: "I have not heard an 'aalim for over fifty years who was as fervent in adherence to the narrations of the Prophet (salallaahu alaihi wassallaam) as Muhammad ibn Aslam."

(See 'Siyar A'laam an-Nubalaa', no. 4968 (2035, 12/195), and 'Al-Hilyah' 9/238)

The Messenger of Allaah (salallaahu 'alaihi wassallam) said:

quote:
"Whoever innovates or accomodates an innovator, then upon him is the curse of Allaah, His angels and the whole of mankind."

(Reported by Bukhaaree, 12/41 and Muslim, 9/140)


This "Jamiat" continues to propogate, accomodate, praise and show affection for the heads of innovation and innovated groups and parties. They set up conferences and lectures with them, they promote the books and teachings of Ahlul-Bid'ah.

Ibn Qudaamah (died 620H) stated:

quote:
"The Salaf used to forbid sitting with the people of innovations, LOOKING INTO THIER BOOKS AND LISTENING TO THEIR WORDS."

(See Al-Aadaabush-Sharee'ah, 1/263)


Yet they still claim they upon the way of the Salaf! Look to the reality, O reader, not the claim. Something does not become handsome just because we called it beautiful, and evil does not become good by us calling it goodness. What is looked towards is the reality, not the mere usage of a beautiful name. The Imaam Ibnul-Qayyim (Died 752AH), rahimahullaah, stated:

quote:
"And as is known these evils are joined with these realities, and WILL NOT DISAPPEAR THROUGH CHANGING THEIR NAMES and outer forms."

("Ighaathatul-Luhfaan" of Ibnul-Qayyim, 1/353)


Our Deen is a Deen of Ittibaa' (following the evidences), it is Deen that adheres to the way of the Salaf in 'Aqeedah and Manhaj and to be ardent upon that. May Allaah give you and us success in understanding and adhering to that.


__________________________________________________________


ekbal.hussain
09-17-2006 @ 2:38 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Abu Abdullah Ekbal Hussain bin Siraj (London, UK)
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Dec 2002
          
A CLEAR AND DECISIVE WARNING AGAINST ABOO USAAMAH ADH-DHAHABEE
& BILAL PHILIPS
(ADDED 10 SEPT 2006)


Shaykh Aboo Amr Abdul-Kareem al Hajooree hafeedhahullaahu taa'aala said (about Abu Usaamah):

"he should not be called Aboo Usaamah, he should be called Aboo Qilaamah al hizbee"

"he is majrooh, and refuted from the ulamaa"

"his statements are not to be given consideration"

"I advise you to repent for your foolishness and misguidance, leave off writing, for you are not from the people who are worthy of writing, even if your face is totally covered in ink"


Listen to the clip:

http://www.assalafi.com/warning_on_aboo_usaamah.mp3


Shaykh Zayed al Wassaabee (hafeedahullaah) on Bilal Philips:

http://www.assalafi.com/Audio%20files/bilal_phillips.mp3


Source: Trinidad Seminar with the Yemeni Mashaayikh

This message was edited by ekbal.hussain on 9-17-06 @ 9:00 PM

spubs.com
09-20-2006 @ 10:41 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Administrator
Posts: 846
Joined: Sep 2002
          


THE CHOICE:
IS THE 'JAMIAT AHL-E-HADITH' CORRECT OR THE 'PERMANENT COMMITTEE FOR FATAWA' HEADED BY SHAYKH IBN BAAZ CORRECT?!


HAFEEZ ULLAH KHAN OF 'JAMIAT AHL-E-HADITH' STATES THAT THE VARIOUS JAMA'AATS & ISLAMIC ORGANISATIONS SHOULD KEEP THEIR SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS!

Hafeez Ullah Khan, one of the heads of the ?Jamiat?:

quote:
?The whole purpose of this discussion is that the Ummah is a victim of splitting and splintering ? it is in dire need of unity and strength and brotherhood. My friends, me stating this does NOT mean that the Religious and Islamic organizations that exist have to lose their specific identities and titles and become one entity ? No, but rather every organization and every jamaa?ah should remain established upon their own individual identities and come together making their unity apparent and it is in this unity that the blessing lies??

(?Itihad ? Unity Muslim? Channel, 7th September 2006)


THE SCHOLARLY RESPONSE:
'PERMANENT COMMITTEE FOR FATAWA' HEADED BY SHAYKH IBN BAAZ STATES THAT WHOEVER SETS UP AND FOLLOWS THESE JAMA'AATS HAS BEEN REBUKED AND THREATENED WITH SEVERE PUNISHMENT

Fatwa of al-Lajnatud-Daa'imah Lil-Iftaa headed by Shaykhul-Islaam Ibn Baaz. Members: Shaykh 'Abdur-Razzaaq 'Afeefee, Shaykh 'Abdullaah ibnul- Ghudayaan, Shaykh 'Abdullaah ibn Qu'ood, were asked:

quote:
QUESTION: "What is the Islamic ruling concerning groups and parties? Is it permissible to have these groups and parties such as 'Hizbut-Tahreer' and 'Al-Ikhwaanil-Muslimeen'?"

ANSWER: "IT IS NOT PERMISSIBLE to divide and separate the Muslims in their Religion into sects, groups and parties... And indeed this separation and splitting is from that which Allaah has forbidden - and He has rebuked and censured whoever brings it about and whoever follows its people - and He threatened its doers with severe punishment. Allaah, the Most High, said:

"And hold fast altogether to the Rope of Allaah and be not divided.." up until He said: "And be NOT like those who divided and differed after the clear proofs had come to them and for them there is a severe punishment." (Aali 'Imraan: 103-105)

And Allaah, the Most High, said:

"Verily those who divided their Religion and became sects/groups, you (O Prophet) have nothing to do with them in the least." (Al-An'aam: 159)

As for the Leader of the Muslims (in a Muslim country), if he was to organise the people and allocate between them the affairs of life, Religion and wordly affairs, then this is permissible."

('Fatawa al-Lajnatud-Daa'imah' (2/144), Fatwa No. 1674)


So who is correct, O reader! Is it the Lajna Daa'imah and Ibn Baaz and Abdullaah al-Ghudayaan with their clear evidences and the 'ijmaa of the Salaf of this Ummah OR the 'Markazi Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith UK' who claim they know better?!

O reader, do not be beguiled into thinking that this a minor affair, a mere difference of opinion. This is an affair of the 'usool, the fundamentals regarding which differing is not permitted, and the Companions did not differ regarding it. The Jamiat since 1991 till this day in its manhaj has only become worse, refusing continuously throughout to accept rectification.

Please read the book of the great scholar al-Allaamah Rabee' ibn Haadee al-Madkhalee called: "Jamaa'ah Waahida Laa Jama'aat, Siraat Waahid Laa Asharaat" in refutation of the false 'usool of 'Abdur-Rahmaan 'Abdul-Khaaliq of 'Jam'iyyah Ihyaa Turaath al-Islaamee' regarding splitting and differing. And this 'Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith' is in full agreement with the 'usool of that Jam'iyyah Ihyaa Turaath as they have admitted and openly claimed - to the extent that 'Abdul-Haadee Omaree (a head of the Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith) translated the book of [Allaamah!!] 'Abdur-Rahmaan 'Abdul-Khaaliq into Urdu, in which he states these false principles. These false principles still form the basis of the both these organisations as you can clearly see.



__________________________________________________________


spubs.com
09-20-2006 @ 1:13 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Administrator
Posts: 846
Joined: Sep 2002
          
Jam'iat Ahle-Hadees Continues Where Abdur-Rahmaan `Abdul-Khaaliq Left Off 12 Years Ago


quote:
?The whole purpose of this discussion is that the Ummah is a victim of splitting and splintering ? it is in dire need of unity and strength and brotherhood. My friends, me stating this does NOT mean that the Religious and Islamic organizations that exist have to lose their specific identities and titles and become one entity ? No, but rather every organization and every jamaa?ah should remain established upon their own individual identities and come together making their unity apparent and it is in this unity that the blessing lies??

(?Itihad ? Unity Muslim? Channel, 7th September 2006)


From an article on Spubs.Com over 5 years ago...


Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq, when Bannaawism began to slowly take over his person, spoke with the multiplicity of groups and parties, i.e. justified the existence of all the various Islamic groups present today, despite their differences in aqidah and manhaj and their falling into the acts of kufr and shirk (in the case of some). This being in direct conflict with the Book and the Sunnah, the Ulamaa began to refute him and advise him. And this continued for a number of years. When Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq did not listen, one of the students of knowledge from Kuwait took some of the errors of Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq to Imaam Ibn Baaz (amongst them, his saying about the multiplicity of groups). Imaam Ibn Baaz refuted these claims and advised the latter to correct himself.

Following this, Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq made an open display of his supposed repentance and that he had taken it all back. His open supposed repentance took place on 20th September 1994, in an article called ?Tanbeehaat wa Ta?aqqubaat? in which he glorified the Permanent Committee and called them ?my fathers? and so and he also made many lies against the Salafi Mashayikh such as Shaikh Rabee? (refer to Jamaa?ah Waahidah of Shaikh Rabee? bin Haadee) . His repentance was somewhat exaggerated, and while previously he had called our Ulamaa, ?mummified, absent in mind and present in body?, ?perfect and complete ignorance?, ?their da?wah does not mean anything? and other such great calamities (which we have documented elsewhere, GRV070004), he then showed the outward love and respect.

Then in a cassette, which is at least 15 months after his open repentance, there occur a number of questions and answers, in which the great deceit of Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq is uncovered and his persistence in innovation and heresy laid bare. Stated Shaikh Rabee? bin Haadee:

?The questioner asks him (Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq) about the verdict of Shaikh Abdul-Azeez Bin Baaz which was in al-Muslimoon magazine (23rd December 1995) and which also contained the refutations of al-Qaradaawi, the Straying Innovator, against it. He answered the question by giving a diplomatic answer which indicated that he was not actually pleased with this fatwaa (i.e. of Ibn Baaz) and this was after his recantation by a long time since his recantation took place on 14th Rabee? ul-Awwal 1415H, corresponding to 20th September 1994. Then the questioner said to him, ?O Shaikh, in relation to the multiplicity of Islamic grous in the Islamic world and their abundance, such as al-Ikhwaan ul-Muslimoon, Jamaa?at ut-Tabligh, Hizb ut-Tahreer and others, we hear two views. One saying this is a good thing because the good points (of this multiplicity) outweigh the bad points. Another orientation which says that this is differing and splitting and this is not allowed because its bad points are greater than its good points?? To which Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq replied, ?Indeed this is a good thing absolutely and there are no negative points in this at all, in splitting and differing. This is not correct?? The questioner said after, ?There is an orientation which states that evil of the multiplicity of groups in the Islamic world outweighs the good, what is your view on this??. To which he replied, ?This is destruction (hadm), destruction, destruction this is. This is an action of destruction?.

This is how Abdur-Rahmaan acts, and does not care at all about his recantation in front of the esteemed Shaikh Ibn Baaz and nor in front of the others from the Ulamaa and understanding ones, those in front of whom he announced publicly, in front of them, his recantation? and Allaah knows best whether he considers the people and their Scholars to be ?a battalion of mummified people?? So where is the respect of Abdur-Rahmaan for Ibn Baz and the Hai?ah Kibaar ul-Ulamaa, which he claims he does, when it is the case that he does not even give respect for other Scholars and other people?? (an-Nasr ul-Azeez, pp. 163-164)

IKHWAAN AND TABLIGH FROM THE SEVENTY-TWO SECTS

And that which puts and end to all the loyalists of Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq and those entrenched in his innovatory principles, is the following statement of Imaam Ibn Baaz.

The Noble Imaam, Ibn Baaz was asked, ?May Allaah be benevolent to you, the hadeeth of the Prophet (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) concerning the division of the Ummah, ?My Ummah will soon split seventy-three sects??, so is the Jamaa?at ut-Tabligh, alongside what they have of acts of Shirk and innovation, and likewise the Ikhwaan ul-Muslimeen, alongside what they have of partisanship, splitting the ranks, using force against the Wullaat al-Umoor, and not hearing and obeying (the Rulers), so do these two sects enter (into those sects mentioned in the hadeeth)?

He replied, ?They enter into the seventy-two sects. Whoever opposes the aqidah of Ahl us-Sunnah enters into the seventy-two sects. The intent behind his saying, ?My Ummah?? means the Ummah that has responded to his call (Ummat al-Ijaabah), meaning they have responded to the call and have made apparent their following of him, and they are the seventy-three sects. The saved and secure one is the one that follows him and shows steadfastness (istiqaamah) upon his religion. And as for the seventy-two sects, amongst them is the disbeliever, the sinner and the innovator, they are of various types.?

The questioner then said, ?Meaning, these two sects (Ikhwaan and Tabligh) are included within those seventy-two sects?? The Shaikh replied, ?Yes, from those seventy-two sects. And so are the Murji?ah and others. The Murji?ah and Khawarij, some of the People of Knowledge consider them to be from the Unbelievers, however, they are actually from the generality of the seventy-two sects.? End of the Shaikh?s words. This exists in the Shaikh?s lesson on ?Sharh ul-Muntaqaa?, recorded on cassette, in Taa?if in the year 1418H.

CONSIDER THIS WELL

Allaah the Most High says, ?And be not of Al≠MushrikŻn (the disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah, polytheists, idolaters, etc.). Of those who split up their religion (i.e. who left the true Isl‚mic Monotheism), and became sects, [i.e. they invented new things in the religion (Bid'ah), and followed their vain desires], each sect rejoicing in that which is with it.? (Ar-Rum 30:31-32).

And from al-Irbaad ibn Saariyah (radiallaahu anhu) who said: ?Allaah's Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) gave us an admonition which caused the eyes to shed tears and the hearts to fear, so we said, ?O Messenger of Allaah, this is as if it were a farewell sermon, so with what do you counsel us?? So he said: ?I have left you upon clear proof , its night is like its day, no one deviates from it except one who is destroyed, and whoever lives long from amongst you will see great controversy. So stick to what you know from my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the orthodox, rightly-guided caliphs - cling to that with your molar teeth, and stick to obedience even if it is to an Abyssinian slave, since the believer is like a submissive camel, wherever he is led, he follows? (Ahmad (4/126), Ibn Maajah (no. 43), al-Haakim (1/96) and others ? Hasan).

Anas bin Maalik reported that Allaah?s Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) said, ?This Ummah will split into seventy-three sects, all of them in the Hellfire except for one.? They asked, ?And what is that sect?? He replied, ?Those who are upon what I and my companions are upon today?. (Tabaraanee in Mu?jamus-Sagheer no. 724, Tirmidhee, 2641, al-Haakim, 1/125).

Abdullaah bin Mas?ood reported, ?Allaah?s Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) drew a line for us, then he said, ?This is Allaah?s way.? Then he drew lines to the right and to the left and said, ?These are differing ways, upon each of these ways is a devil (Shaytaan) calling to it.? Then he recited, ?And this is My Straight Path, so follow it, and do not follow (other) paths, for they will separate you away from His Path.? (a-An?aam 6:153).? (Ahmad 1/435 and at-Tayaaleesee no. 244).

Stated the Lord, Owner of Majesty and Splendor, ?Surely, Shait‚n (Satan) is an enemy to you, so take (treat) him as an enemy. He only invites his Hizb (followers) that they may become the dwellers of the blazing Fire.? (Fatir 35:6)

And these texts are by way of example only, since there are scores of their likes in the Book of our Lord and the statements of our Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam).

Then there comes this Abdur-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq with his Bannaawi da?wah and says that what Allaah and His Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) have said ?is not correct? and is but ?destruction? and that other than what Allaah and His Messenger have said is ?absolute goodness?. And all of this after the hujjah was established against him and after he had made a ?public repentance? for speaking with the permissibility of the multiplicity of groups and parties, and from Allaah is the refuge.



See: www.spubs.com/r.cfm?ID=GRV070014 for full article.

These two statements from the spokesmen for the Jam'iyyat Ahle Hadees and the Jam'iyyat Ihyaa at-Turaath are the same in meaning. Both of them imply that whatever the Jamaa'aat are upon, and the fact that they have distinct identities (i.e. methodologies and creeds and orientations) are either a "blessing" or "goodness".



__________________________________________________________


spubs.com
11-07-2006 @ 10:11 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Administrator
Posts: 846
Joined: Sep 2002
          


SALMA YAQOOB THE ELECTION CANDIDATE ENDORSED OFFICIALLY BY THE "JAMIAT AHL-E-HADITH", STATES:
THAT IF SHE WAS IN SAUDI ARABIA, SHE WOULD CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE HIJAAB!


A brother in another thread on this site stated: "After listening to the debate on BBC Website I thought that it would be a good idea that the brothers post some articles concerning the Hijaab as a reminder to the Muslims and a rebuttal of the apologists and a refutation of the disbelievers."

What was shocking is that Salma Yaqoob says:

quote:
"In Iran and Saudi Arabia the Hijaab is a tool of oppression because it is forced on women and if I was there I would campaign against it"!!


Click here to listen:

>>SALMA YAQOOB'S DEFENCE & ATTACK ON THE HIJAB<<

Note, O reader, this woman representative of the Socialist party has been endorsed officially by the the Jamiat, she has visited GREEN LANE MOSQUE, the UK centre of the "Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith" and lectured there!

Heads of the 'Jamiat', such as Abdul-Haadee Omari, have stood upon podiums and delivered verdicts obligating Muslims to vote for her.


ADVICE AND REBUKE OVER YEARS FROM ALL QUARTERS:

And what is ironic is that it is the Salafis who have advised with correction of this Jamiat (in direct face-to-face meetings, books, tapes and articles) for over 15 years are the ones being accused of evil. Shaikh Yahyah Al-Hajooree visited Birmingham in 1998 and saw the grevious errors of the Jamiat first hand over a period of three weeks and advised them, to no avail. Then Shaikh Yahyah recorded a tape in Luton rebutting the doubts of Suhaib Hasan and warning against his errors. Shaikh Muhammad ibn Haadee, from the Scholars of Madeenah, likewise advised Suhaib Hasan in 1997 and 1998 about his errors - again to no avail.

Imaam Muqbil Ibn Haadee (rahimahullaah) advised and rebuked Suhaib Hasan, ten years ago. Likewise Shaikhul-Islaam Ibn Baaz (rahimahullaah) advised and corrected Suhaib Hasan ten years ago. Did Suhaib Hasan and his followers and his 'Jamiat' rectify? Not in the slightest! Rather Suhaib Hasan wrote to Al-Muhaddith Muqbil ibn Haadee (rahimahullaah) fully explaining himself and his side of the 'story' - Shaykh Muqbil's response was to refute him again, as now Shaikh Muqbil was even more certain of the errors of Suhaib Hasan!

Suhaib Hasan and the Jamiat have been advised by callers and Scholars alike, yet they still persist and increase in rejection of the truth. In one particular officially organised meeting in which the heads of the Jamiat such as Abdul-Hadi Omari, Hafizullah Khan, Sher Khan Jamil, Shuaib Ahmed Mirpuri and other elected committee members, were present, some of the Salafi brothers presented to them the fatawa and evidences of the Scholars against their false positions and practices such as promotion of Syed Qutb, Yusuf Al-Qardaawee, Abdul-Rahmaan Abdul-Khaaliq also their inviting extreme Soofees, Ikhwaanees, Deobandees, Asha'rees and even kuffaar to their masjid to deliver lectures. At the end of the meeting, they categorically rejected the positions of the Scholars and stated that either the Salafis in Birmingham conform to the 'principles and rules' of the 'Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith' or: "Please get out of our Masjid and set up your own Masjid upon your way!". Stranger still, whilst inviting and providing platforms for the people of innovation, shirk and kufr in their own Masjid, they openly prevented Shaikh Muhammad Ibn Haadee and Shaikh Abdus-Salaam Burjis in 1998 from delivering seminars in their Masjid. It was only after a lengthy heated debate with the organisers that they eventually and reluctantly allowed the Salafis to invite these two Shaikhs into the Masjid. NOT one of the heads of the Jamiat attended any of the seminars and lectures, neither of Shaikh Muhammad, Shaikh Abdus-Salaam, Shaikh Yahyah etc.

Wallaahul-musta'aan.

__________________________________________________________
[url=http://www.salaf.com/][/url]

MasjidulBayaanNJ
01-07-2007 @ 5:44 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Masjidul Bayaan Asbury Park NJ (New Jersey, USA)
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: May 2006
          


THE ADMONITIONS & REFUTATIONS OF
IMAAM BADEE' UD-DEEN SHAAH
AS-SINDEE AR-RAASHIDEE
(rahimahullah)
ON JAMIAT AHLE-HADITH


The following are excerpts from a lecture of the Muhaddith of Pakistan, Al Allaamah Badee'ud Deen Shah Ar Raashidee (rahimahullah) on the mistakes and deviations that began to appear during his lifetime in 'Jamiat Ahle-Hadeeth'. The Shaykh, walhamdu lillaah, was not known to bite his tongue on the mistakes of the various sects that emerged in the Indian sub-continent, and the Jamiat was no exception to this.

Said the Shaykh (rahimahullah):

I have been requested to present my views on the topic of ?Rectification of AhleHadeeth?. It is astonishing that AhleHadeeth are in need of Rectification. Allaah the most High has mentioned two characteristics of the one who rectifies. Firstly, he should establish his salaah in accordance to the mannerisms of the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam). The reality is that worship is only what is established on the mannerisms of Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam). Otherwise the Jews, the Christians, and the Hindus also perform acts of worship but they are not accepted by Allaah. The second characteristic of the rectifier is that he should adhere to the divine revelation, and it is only the Quraan and the Sunnah that can be referred to as divine revelation. So the rectifier is the one who establishes his salaah and adheres to divine revelation in all of his affairs. H should not adhere to anything else. In this respect this definition does not apply to anyone other than Ahlil Hadeeth, so they themselves are the rectifiers. Now they too are in need of rectification; indeed this is something new.



HABITS OF PICTURE TAKING (PHOTOGRAPHY), VIDEO RECORDINGS, & THE FOUNDATIONS OF SHIRK

For example, now our brothers from (Jami?yat) AhleHadeeth have a love for picture taking. Our conferences are not established except that there is picture taking. How can a conference be blessed when the curse of Allaah is showered upon it (because of picture taking)! Can that conference be a means of guidance, a means of righteousness? And those people who commit these actions, should they be considered people who strive in the path of Allaah or a disgraceful shameful people. May Allaah give you good, why has this shamefulness occurred? It has come because we have lost the safeguarding of the religion, insight, and knowledge of the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam) that Allaah has placed in our hearts.

Now what is the reality; we have begun video recording and picture taking, when (before) this never took place. For Allaah?s sake, tell me: When these actions did not take place, when the people did not know these affairs, where the Muslims in a better condition then or is their condition better now? There was Emaan, Taqwaa, and dependence on Allaah in the previous condition, there is no Emaan, Taqwaa, and dependence on Allaah in the present one. ?We will leave him to what he has chosen.?  This has taken place.

This is how Shirk will take place. We will have pictures taken, and then we will exalt them and venerate them, and adorn them with flowers. Indeed this is the original source of Shirk. Those people, who partake in actions of Shirk such as these, are they going to strive for the sake of Allaah, or bring about corruption.


I have been attending your conferences in Punjab for 45 years. At these times when the people used to invite us to their homes to eat, we used to find written in their homes, "Our Lord! We have wronged ourselves. If You do not forgive us, and bestow Your Mercy upon us, we shall certainly be of the losers."

We used to find the ahaadeeth and advices of the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam) written in their homes; they had matters of the religion written in their homes. Today if you go to the homes, you find in places the pictures of men and in places the pictures of women; it is the opposite of how things used to be. This is the condition.  Where is the honor of these people today.

Islaam erased these affairs and closed the doors of Shirk. People give us the example of identification cards and passports. Allaah knows that our hearts rebuke us, but we do not do these things because of personal desires. Are the conferences going to seize to be beneficial without photography? Have you ever seen a gathering larger than this? So this habit should not be found amongst us (AhleHadeeth). Others are responsible for their own affairs. We are saddened by the actions of our people.  Our own people have destroyed this religion. They have made the Jam?eeyah a means of bringing about disagreement.  If you truly desire to be rectified, then repent to Allaah that neither will you take pictures nor will you have pictures taken. This is the first affair, if you desire to rectify yourself, then make yourself aware of these problems. My friends, all of these affairs are in need of our rectification, so make a firm decision that we will never commit actions such as these.



THE CURSE OF DEMOCRACY IN THE RANKS OF JAMIAT AHLE-HADITH

In this manner, some of our brothers have accepted democracy and have mistaken it for Islaam. It is astonishing how they have accepted a western ideology while being AhleHadeeth. Did the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam) give us this ideology, did the rightly guided Khulafaa give us this ideology, or did the four Imaams give us this ideology? Who gave us this ideology? An ideology emerged from Europe and you accepted, you deemed the ideology of the Messenger sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam deficient! Let me ask you one question. Are there any opposing political parties in the Sharee?ah. If the government was established for the sake of Allaah, and someone stood in opposition of it, what would become of him? There would be hostility everywhere. Democracy safeguards these hostilities, and this is why evil is given a chance to exist. It is for this reason that these people who are starving for power attempt to win power and fight (amongst each other).


Has Islaam not taught you how to run the governments? Did not the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam) establish an Islaamic government within a kingdom of kufr? How did the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam), how did he establish this government? He acted upon the guidance of Allaah and he was successful, Allaah gave him victory, Allaah gave him success. All forces were in opposition to the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam) and they still are; the forces of these selfish maulvis (religious leaders), the forces of saints (peers), and the forces of the wealthy. All of these groups are against each other but are united against the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam). The time came when the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam) was given victory, and he announced on the hill of Safaa, ?There is none worthy of worship except Allaah alone, and He aided His salve, and completed His promise, and He by Himself defeated the forces. This is Islaam, and this is our methodology, and this is our Imaam.

How is it that we accept those things that he (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam) cursed, and we accept the methodology of the enemies of the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam)??

Today, there is a group that claims that they are from the upholders of the religion, and they used to claim at one time that it was impermissible to partake and run in elections. Later, they claimed that all of these things are necessary and permissible if we want to gain power, so they began to partake in all of these things that these worldly (political) parties partake in. The people of the Jam?eeyah (AhleHadeeth) began to walk in their footsteps.

This is what taqleed is, acting upon the correct and incorrect actions of your Imaam; they do not separate, take what is correct and what is incorrect, this is the Muqallid. When these people (who partake in elections) received the fatwa that these action are impermissable, none of them objected, even though it is necessary that one of the two is incorrect.

An ideology in which an individual who seeks leadership stands in elections, and they divide into groups and parties, and they severely waste the wealth of the Muslims on backbiting and mud-slinging, how can an ideology such as this be correct?

So my brothers, this methodology in not found in the Quraan and the Sunnah. The methodology of the Quran and the Sunnah is that of the Khilaafah, where the Muslims have one leader under whose order all are included..."



LIMITING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HADEETH [ONLY] TO THE PRAYERS AND THE AFFAIRS OF THE MASJID

The reality is that being from AhleHadeeth for us is like the coverings of our heads in the Masaajid. You have witnessed that in many Masaajid there are hats, since the maulvis have given fataawa that the prayer cannot be performed except that the head is covered. So a person enters the mosques, covers his head while he is prayings, and after he finishes, removes and returns the hat to its place.

O AhleHadeeth!! Your methodology has become like those hats in the mosques! When you enter the Mosques, you say Ameen with a raised voice, you perform raf?ul-yadayn (the raising of the hands before and after rukoo?), and you implement all the affairs. When you leave the mosques, there is no regularity/consistency in your actions!

We consider AhleHadeeth to be those who are AhleHadeeth when they are in the masaajid, and they are Ahlehadeeth when they leave the masaajid, and they are AhleHadeeth when they are cutting wood in the jungles, and they are AhleHadeeth when they are plowing the lands, and they are AhleHadeeth when they are managing shops, and they are AhleHadeeth when they lift their pens as judges, and they are AhleHadeeth when they are seated on royal thrones.

Ahlehadeeth are those that keep the Quraan and the Sunnah in the forefront regardless of the condition in which they find themselves. It should not be that you are AhleHadeeth when in the Masjid, and when outside, then politics are by personal desires, livelihood is by personal desires.


Full Transcript Coming Soon to
www.TheRighteouspath.com and www.SunnahPublishing.net

This message was edited by MasjidulBayaanNJ on 1-7-07 @ 9:14 PM

spubs.com
01-07-2007 @ 7:47 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Administrator
Posts: 846
Joined: Sep 2002
          


Raised for benefit. Coming soon:

Shaikh Yahyah Al-Hajooree on Suhaib Hasan.

__________________________________________________________


SyedImran
01-08-2007 @ 4:18 PM    Notify Admin about this post
AbuUbaid Syed Imran bin Syed Shamsul Bari (New York City, USA)
Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Oct 2006
          
Assalamu Alikum wa rahmatullahi wa barkatuhu

I just want to make dua to Allah Azza Wa jalla that, may Allah tayala reward all those who are striving to expose the evils of Jamate Ahlul Hadith and their mistakes for the sake of Allah.

Just like to quote Sh. Badee'Ud- Deen- Shaah As-Sindee Ar-Raashidee (rahimahullah):  

"O AhleHadeeth!! Your methodology has become like those hats in the mosques! When you enter the Mosques, you say Ameen with a raised voice, you perform raf?ul-yadayn (the raising of the hands before and after rukoo?), and you implement all the affairs. When you leave the mosques, there is no regularity/consistency in your actions!"

This is the condition of many "Ahle hadeeth" in Bangladesh also. Allahul Mustayan.

Assalamu Alikum Wa rahmatullahi wa barkatuhu

Abuubaid Imran


spubs.com
02-01-2007 @ 6:37 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Administrator
Posts: 846
Joined: Sep 2002
          


Suhaib Hasan Joins Celebration of Prophet?s Birthday!!

Below is a cut-out from the ?The Muslim News? dated  20th May 2003, page 7.

It shows Suhaib Hasan of the ?Jamiat Ahle-Hadith UK?, with the Conservative Party and other Muslim organisations celebrating the so-called Birthday of the Prophet, may the peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him.

A picture speaks a 1,000 words (Suhaib Hasan is far right)!



Question to Permanent Committee for Research and Verdicts:

What is the ruling upon celebrating the birthday of the Prophet (sal Allaahu alaiyhi wa sallam) in the month of Rabee? ul Awwal, as a means of extolling him (sal Allaahu alaiyhi wa sallam)?

Answer:

Extolling the Prophet and venerating him is only through: eemaan in everything with which he came from Allaah, and following his sharee?ah ? in aqeedah (creed), and speech, and action, and manners ? and leaving off innovating in the religion. And celebrating the birthday of the Prophet (sal Allaahu alaiyhi wa sallam) is from innovating in the religion. And with Allaah is the tawfeeq. And may peace and blessings be upon our Prophet, Muhammad and upon his family and Companions.

Permanent Committee for Research and Verdicts. Shaykh `Abdul-`Azeez Bin Baz, Shaykh `Abdullah bin Ghudayaan, Shaykh `Abdullaah bin Qu`ood, Shaykh `Abdur-Razzaaq al-`Afeefee. Question 1 from fatwa number 3257, Volume 3, p 23, of the fatawa of the Permanent Committee.

Question to Shaikh Ibn Baaz (rahimahullaah):

What is the ruling concerning celebrating birthdays?

Answer:

Celebrating birthdays has no source whatsoever in the pure shariah. In fact, it is an innovation, since the Messenger of Allah (sallallaahu ?alaihi-wasallam) said, ?Whoever introduces anything into this matter of ours that does not belong to it shall have it rejected.? This was recorded by al-Bukhari and Muslim. In a version recorded by Muslim and by al-Bukhari in definitive muallaq form. ?Whoever performs a deed which is not in accord with our affairs, that deed is rejected.? It is well-known that the Prophet (sallallaahu ?alaihi-wasallam) did not celebrate his birthday at all during his lifetime nor did he ever order it to be celebrated. Nor did he teach such to his Companions. Therefore, the rightly-guided caliphs and all of his Companions did not celebrate it. They are the most knowledgeable of the people concerning his sunnah and they are the most beloved to the Prophet (sallallaahu ?alaihi-wasallam). They were also the most keen upon following whatever the Prophet (sallallaahu ?alaihi-wasallam) brought. Therefore, if one is supposed to celebrate the Prophet (sallallaahu ?alaihi-wasallam) birthday, this would have been made evident at their time. Similarly, not one of the scholars of the best of generations celebrated his birthday nor did they order it to be done. Therefore, it is known from the above that such a celebration is not from the Law that Allah sent Muhammed (sallallaahu ?alaihi-wasallam) with. We ask Allah and all Muslims to witness that if the Prophet (sallallaahu ?alaihi-wasallam) had done so or ordered such to be done, or even if the Companions had done so, we would rush to do it and call others to do it. This is because, and all praises are due to Allah, we are the most keen in following his sunnah and respecting his commands and prohibitions. We ask Allah, for ourselves and for all our brethren Muslims, steadfastness upon the truth, avoiding everything that differs from Allah?s pure shariah. Verily, He is Generous and Noble. Shaykh `Abdul-`Azeez Bin Baz

Islamic Fatawa Regarding Women - Darussalam Pg.33-34



__________________________________________________________



MasjidulBayaanNJ
02-03-2007 @ 5:21 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Masjidul Bayaan Asbury Park NJ (New Jersey, USA)
Member
Posts: 42
Joined: May 2006
          

IMAAM BADEE' UD-DEEN SHAAH
AS-SINDEE AR-RAASHIDEE
(rahimahullah)
ON THE CELEBRATION OF MAWLIDUN NABI
(THE PRPOPHET'S BIRTHDAY)


The following are excerpts from a lecture of the Muhaddith of Pakistan, Al Allaamah Badee'ud Deen Shah Ar Raashidee (rahimahullah) on those that celebrate the Mawlidun Nabi, especially in the Indo-Pakistan subcontinent where it is celebrated more joyously than the Eid by the cooking of sweets and decorating of homes with lights similar to those that the Kuffaar use to decorate their homes on christmas.

How far have these people strayed from the teachings of that great man, whose very life was a struggle against the actions that the Jamee'ah AhleHadeeth have turned to!

Said the Shaykh (rahimahullah):

Indeed, if you truly love the Messenger of Allaah sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam, and you should love him, as it is obligatory, and it is a portion of Emaan, and Emaan will not remain without it, but the question is what is that love? Is it that you should eat and fill your stomachs and this is how you fullfil the rights of the love (of the Messenger sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam)? Regardless of the fact that he did not eat adequately for six months at a time, and a fire was not lit in his home for thirty days, for months at a time they did not have adequate food, never mind all of that, you go ahead and fill yourself up, and that is how you fulfill that love! The intent is that we should please Allaah as they (i.e. the Sahaabah) pleased Allaah.



Said the Shaykh rahimahullah

Those people (i.e. the Sahaabah) also loved the Messenger sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam, but to whom did they show their love, they showed it to Allaah. They believed that this love was a portion of Emaan, hence it should be shown to the One who will accept our Emaan, the acceptance and rejection of it is up to Him! We show our love for the Messenger sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam to the people. This is the difference! They also claimed to love the Messenger sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam. Anas (bin Maalik) mentions, ?There was none who they loved more than the Messenger of Allaah sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam. But who witnessed that love, Allaah witnessed that love. They thought that love to be a portion of Emaan, we don?t believe that love to be a portion of Emaan. If we thought it to be a portion of Emaan, then for whom is Emaan? It is for Allaah! Emaan is for Allaah! So we should show it to Allaah that we love this man. Why do we love this man, because You (O? Allaah) have sent him, because You have chosen him, he was not our choice, we choose what You have chosen.

But how will you like what He has chosen, you have already chosen those that you will follow!. You are not willing to accept what Allaah has chosen! (They believe) What will happen on the Day of Judgment will happen, but here the people will beat us with their shoes that you do not accept the Messenger sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam, so let us cook some sweets and show the people that we do accept him. To prove yourselves to be Muslims and those who love the Messenger sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam, you cooked sweets, decorated your homes with lights (on the Mawlid), and showed the people! If they truly desired to show their love to Allaah, then by Allaah, they would not walk behind any saint, they would not walk behind anyone, they would adapt the manners of Muhammad sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam, and say O Allaah, we only want what you have sent and nothing other than that.


This message was edited by MasjidulBayaanNJ on 2-3-07 @ 7:25 PM

spubs.com
02-04-2007 @ 3:00 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Administrator
Posts: 846
Joined: Sep 2002
          


ABU USAMAH KHALIFAH ADH-DHAHABI & HIS SPEECH CONCERNING THE ISLAMIC GOVERNMENTS:

HE IS AN OFFICIAL EMPLOYEE, A KEY LECTURER, A KHATEEB,
& AN IMAAM OF THE "MARKAZI JAMIAT AHL-E-HADITH UK"
AT GREEN LANE MOSQUE

Abu Usaamah Khaleefah adh-Dhahabee, stated in the year 2000, during a sermon delivered in the USA:


quote:
"You are all aware of the astronomical and extortionate amounts we are paying for one gallon of gas - about a dollar 50, 65, 70 cents for a gallon of gas... and that's from their politics and games!

What's the point? The point is that Allaah has given the Imaams of the Muslims the great big Imaan, this black gold! - that if they wanted they could use this gold as a weapon against these infidels and bring them literally to their knees calling - but what do we find the imaams of the muslims doing? Bickering and fighting amongst themselves, going to the devils and asking the devils to solve their problems [saying],

'What do you want to do Mr Devil with the stuation?' - so we have the states that are in the 'khaleej' or the gulf, Saudi Arabia being the main one, trying to help the Devil to keep the prices up so that their infrastructure here [in the USA] can get blessed, and then we have the other smaller poorer countries saying, 'NO! let's do something else' - and the people are arguing and fighting amongst themselves - Why?

Because ALL of them put the Book of Allaah (tabaraka wa ta'aala) behind their back and they put the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allaah (salallaahu alayhi wasallam) on the side!

And with all of that there is no point of meeting for those people.. the devils are gonna be coming for them...."


(Source: Recorded Khutbah delivered in the USA, year 2000, discussing the hadeeth of Ibn 'Umar, that the Prophet (salallaahu alayhi wasallam) came to us and said: "O Muhaajiroon! You may afflicated by five things, Allaah forbid that you should live to see them.." Reported by Ibn Maajah.


** THE TRUE POSITION OF THE SALAF & THE SALAFI SCHOLARS IN THIS AFFAIR

Shaikh Saaleh Al-Fawzaan stated:

quote:
"The Saudi state ever since it began has always aided the religion and its adherents. And it was not founded except upon this basis. And whatever it does at the moment in spending material wealth to support Muslims in every place, setting up centres and mosques, sending du?at (to other countries), printing books ? at the forefront of which is the Noble Qur?an -, opening centres of learning and faculties of knowledge, and its judging by the Islamic Shari?ah, and also setting up a separate body for enjoining the good and forbidding the evil in every city ? then all of this is a clear and evident proof of it?s aid to Islam and its adherents. And this is thorn in the throats of the people of hypocrisy and the people of evil and dissension. And Allaah is the Aider of His religion even if the pagans and the biased partisans may detest it.

And we do not say that this state is perfect from every single aspect and that it does not have any mistakes. Mistakes occur by every single person and we ask Allaah that he helps this state in correcting its mistakes.

But if this person (who makes such a claim) was to look at his own self, he would find mistakes that would prevent his tongue from speaking about others and make him feel ashamed of looking at others."

(Al-Ajwibah al-Mufidah of Jamal bin Farihan al-Harithi.)


Imaam Ibn Abee 'Aasim said in "Kitaabus-Sunnah" (2/251),

quote:
"Chapter: How are the Rulers of the people to be advised?" He then related:

From Shurayh Ibn 'Ubaid al-Hadramee and other than him, who said: 'Iyaad Ibn Ghunm was whipping a person of a land which was conquered. So Hishaam Ibn Hakeem spoke harshly with him, until 'Iyaad became angry. So he remained like this through the night, then he came to Hishaam Ibn Hakeem and sought an excuse from him. Then Hishaam said to Iyaad, "Have you not heard the Prophet's (salallaahu 'alaihi wassallam) statement,'Verily the person who shall suffer the severest punishment is the one who is the most severe in punishing the people in this world.'"

So Iyaad Ibn Ghunm said, "O Hishaam Ibn Hakeem! Indeed we have heard what you have heard, but have you not heard the statement of Allaah's Messenger (salallaahu 'alaihi wassallam), 'Whoever wishes to advise the ruler concerning a matter, then let him not do it openly. Rather, he should take him by the hand and take him into seclusion. So if he accepts his advice, then he has achieved his objective, and if he does not accept it from him, then he has still conveyed that which was a duty upon him.' And verily you - O Hishaam - are a reckless fool, you dare to come out against the ruler of Allaah?! So wahy are not afraid that you may be killed by the ruler, so then you would be the one killed by the Ruler of Allaah, the blessed and exalted?!"

In addition to Ibn Abee Aasim, related also by Ahmad (3/403), authenticated by Al-Albaanee in Dhilaalul-Jannah fee Takhreejis-Sunnah (no.1096).


Imaam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal said:

quote:
"Verily I supplicate for the ruler for his rectification, success and support, night and day. I see this as obligatory upon me."

Refer to As-Sunnah (no. 14) of Aboo Bakr al-Khallaal.


Ibn al-Qayyim (d. 752H) - may Allaah have mercy upon him - said:

quote:
??The Prophet (sallallaahu ?alaihi-wasallam) legislated for his ummah, the obligation of rejecting the evil so that by its rejection, the goodness that Allaah and His Messenger love is obtained. And when rejecting the evil leads to what is more evil and more hated by Allaah and His Messenger then it is not allowed to reject it - even if Allaah hates it and detests those who perform it (the evil). And this is like rejection [inkaar] against the kings, and the ones in authority by coming out against them - for verily, that is the basis and foundation of every evil (sharr) and every tribulation (fitnah) till the end of time.? (I?laam al-Muwaqqi?een)


Al-Hasan al-Basri (d. 110H) used to say,

quote:
?Verily al-Hajjaaj is a punishment of Allaah, so do not repel the punishment of Allaah with your hands, but you must (repel it) with humility and submission?.


Al-Hasan al-Basri,

quote:
?Know ? may Allaah pardon you ? that the tyranny of the kings is a retribution (niqmah) from among the retributions of Allaah the Most High. And Allaah?s retributions are not to be faced with the sword, but they are to be faced with taqwaa and are repelled with supplication and repentance, remorse (inaabah) and abstention from sins. Verily, when the punishments of Allaah are met with the sword, are more severe. And Maalik bin Deenaar narrated to me that al-Hajjaaj (Ibn Yoosuf) used to say, ?Know that every time you commit a sin Allaah will bring about a punishment from the direction of your ruler(sultaan)?. And I have I have also been told that a person said to al-Hajjaaj, ?Do you do such and such with the Ummah of Muhammad (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam)?? So he replied, ?For the reason that I am the punishment of Allaah upon the people of Iraaq, when they innovated into their religion whatever they innovated, and when they abandoned the commands of the their Prophet ? alaihis salaam ? whatever they abandoned.? (Adaab Hasan al-Basri, of Ibn al-Jawzee, pp.119-120, by way of Mu?aamalat ul-Hukkaam, of Abdus-Salaam al-Burjis).


Shaikh Al-Albaanee said:

quote:
"We support EVERYONE who calls for the refutaion of the one who comes out in opposition against the Rulers, and those who encourage the Muslims to come out [in opposition] against the Rulers."  
(Fataawaa al-'Ulamaa'il-Akaabir p.97)

__________________________________________________________


spubs.com
02-10-2007 @ 3:55 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Administrator
Posts: 846
Joined: Sep 2002
          


REBUTTING A DOUBT CONCERNING THE JAMIAT AHLE-HADITH UK AND ELECTIONS

Certain individuals have wrongly assumed that the point of contention over the issue of elections between the ?Markazi Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith UK? and others is based upon a difference of opinion between the Scholars. Nothing could be further from from truth. Our contention is: 1. that the Jamiat holds that democratic elections are supported by Islaam and the sharee?ah, 2. that the one who does not vote is sinful and responsible for any resulting evil, and, 3. the sinful innovations they themselves fall into due to their involvement in the political arena. These false principles of the Jamiat are in contradiction to Islaam and not supported by any textual proofs, nor from the way of the Salaf, nor supported by the Scholars of Islaam.

As for certain Scholars that hold that voting is permitted as a lesser of evils, then that is an ijtihaad that is held to be erroneous by other Scholars who bring strong textual and reasoned arguments, and we hope to make those clear some time in the future, inshaa?Allaah. Recently some erroneous people have began to say that the Jamiat is supported in its positions on elections by some scholars. And this statement of their?s is untrue and unfounded, rather NO Salafi scholar has stated that democratic elections are supported by the Sharee?ah, nor that one is sinful or ?carries the burden of any resulting sufferring? if he does not vote.

Shaikh Al-Albaanee stated in Silsilatul Hudaa wan-Noor, Tape 284:

quote:
"However, if the situation is contrary to this, and this is what I think the question is referring to, then one of them must be selected due to the electoral process established today. It is upon you to know that this system is not Islamic in any way whatsoever..


Let us repeat the statement of Shaikh Al-Albaanee: "It is upon you to know that this system is not Islamic in any way whatsoever"!

Now let us repeat the statement of Abdul-Haadee, a head of the UK Markazi Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith:

quote:
?The act of taking part in elections is an activity that is in fact supported by the Sharee?ah (the Islamic Legislation)??


(Source: ?The Dawn?, Title: ?On the Eve of Election? by Dr. Naseem, Salma Yaqoob & Imam Abdul Hadi. The Newsletter of the Birmingham Central Mosque Trust Ltd, June 2004 /Rabbi al-Thani 1425 AH, Issue 164)

So Al-Albaanee holds them to be against Islaam and the Jamiat holds democratic elections to be from Islaam. So let us not confuse the issues.

And let us not confuse the ijtihaad of Shaikh Al-Albaanee (rahimahullaah) with the deviations of the Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith UK, and thereby claim that Jamiat was correct AND following the scholars. Look at the base principle (asl) of Shaikh Al-Albaanee in stating the Islamic position on democatric elections and the base principle of the Ahle-hadith UK in which they make it binding to vote and regard the one who does not to be sinful - Abdul-Haadi Omari of the Jamiat said:

quote:
?If one chooses not to participate due to ignorance and someone of a corrupt and immoral background is elected then the burden of any resulting suffering and injustice will be upon those who refused to use their vote.?


(Source: ?The Dawn?, Title: ?On the Eve of Election? by Dr. Naseem, Salma Yaqoob & Imam Abdul Hadi. The Newsletter of the Birmingham Central Mosque Trust Ltd, June 2004 /Rabbi al-Thani 1425 AH, Issue 164)

The Shaikh Muhammad al-Imaam of Yemen (from the senior students of Al-Allaamah Muqbil ibn Haadee) states in complete opposition to Abdul-Hadi Omari and the Jamiat:

quote:
?And it does not suffice the opposer [of the Sunnah] with claiming that 'Elections' are [merely] permissible only, but rather he increases the 'clay with more water' (i.e. that he makes the affair worse) ? so he says: "They [elections] are obligatory [to enter into] and the one who does not [enter into them] is sinful and a faasiq (a transgressing wrong-doer) and that he has not fulfilled his trust or responsibility.. and so on."


So who is the one who claims that the Jamiat ahl-e-Hadith based their rulings and opinions on the fatawa of the Scholars?! They based their rulings on desires and whims, regarding themselves to be Muftis and Imaams! And most possibly the greatest scholar of Pakistan and India in last century or two, Allaamah Badee' Ud-Deen (rahimahullaah) rebuked them and censured them severely, in his own words when he said:

quote:
"In this manner, some of our brothers (of Jamiat AhleHadith) have accepted democracy and have mistaken it for Islaam. It is astonishing how they have accepted a western ideology while being AhleHadeeth. Did the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam) give us this ideology, did the rightly guided Khulafaa give us this ideology, or did the four Imaams give us this ideology? Who gave us this ideology? An ideology emerged from Europe and you accepted, you deemed the ideology of the Messenger sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam deficient! Let me ask you one question. Are there any opposing political parties in the Sharee?ah. If the government was established for the sake of Allaah, and someone stood in opposition of it, what would become of him? There would be hostility everywhere. Democracy safeguards these hostilities, and this is why evil is given a chance to exist. It is for this reason that these people who are starving for power attempt to win power and fight (amongst each other).

Has Islaam not taught you how to run the governments? Did not the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam) establish an Islaamic government within a kingdom of kufr? How did the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam), how did he establish this government? He acted upon the guidance of Allaah and he was successful, Allaah gave him victory, Allaah gave him success. All forces were in opposition to the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam) and they still are; the forces of these selfish maulvis (religious leaders), the forces of saints (peers), and the forces of the wealthy. All of these groups are against each other but are united against the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam). The time came when the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam) was given victory, and he announced on the hill of Safaa, ?There is none worthy of worship except Allaah alone, and He aided His salve, and completed His promise, and He by Himself defeated the forces. This is Islaam, and this is our methodology, and this is our Imaam.

How is it that we accept those things that he (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam) cursed, and we accept the methodology of the enemies of the Messenger (sallallaahu alaihi wa sallam)??

Today, there is a group that claims that they are from the upholders of the religion, and they used to claim at one time that it was impermissible to partake and run in elections. Later, they claimed that all of these things are necessary and permissible if we want to gain power, so they began to partake in all of these things that these worldly (political) parties partake in. The people of the Jam?eeyah (AhleHadeeth) began to walk in their footsteps.

This is what taqleed is, acting upon the correct and incorrect actions of your Imaam; they do not separate, take what is correct and what is incorrect, this is the Muqallid. When these people (who partake in elections) received the fatwa that these action are impermissable, none of them objected, even though it is necessary that one of the two is incorrect.

An ideology in which an individual who seeks leadership stands in elections, and they divide into groups and parties, and they severely waste the wealth of the Muslims on backbiting and mud-slinging, how can an ideology such as this be correct?

So my brothers, this methodology in not found in the Quraan and the Sunnah..."


Shaikh Al-Albaanee after stating the evils of democratic elections and voting, then states it is the lesser of evils:

quote:
I say yes, because the Muslims in this case are between two evils. Similarly, this is the case if the candidates were Muslims, since amongst the Muslims are Communists, Baathists and so on. Okay, do we just sit back and watch or should we choose the one whose harm is less?

(Silsilatul Hudaa wan-Noor, Tape 284)

So where is the comparison between the statement of this Imaam and Muhaddith and statement of the Markazi Jamiat Ahle-Hadith, as forwarded by the 'mufti' and 'scholar' of the Jamiat, Abdul-Haadee Omari, who does not regard democratic elections to be wrong and in opposition to Islam, but rather supported by Islaam! The Jamiat Ahle-Hadith then proceeds to enact this deviated opinion which is NOT supported by the scholars. How? By the following:

1. Inviting socialists and communists to their mosques to deliver lectures.

2. Attending photo opportunities with politicians, even those who support suicide bombings in Iraaq and Palestine!

3. Free-mixing with females.

4. Attending rallies, protests, and anti-government street demonstrations, and encouranging all those who attend their mosques to do so.

5. Giving fatwas containing lies upon Islaam, such as praise of the grave-worshippers and innovators.

6. Organising gatherings and inviting innovators (such Jihadists, Soofees, partisans, secularists), politicians, other faith leaders to address their congegrations.

7. Attending innovated celebrations of the Soofees along with the politicians, such as the Prophet's Birthday!

So do you see all this in the ijtihaad and fatwa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee regarding voting?! Shaikh Al-Albaanee and Shaikh Ibn Baaz are free from such false ascriptions.

And let us look again at the clear statement of Al-Imaam al-Muhaddith Shaikhul-Islaam Al-Albaanee, so we are not deceived by those who claim that the Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith and Jamiat Ihyaa Turaath are upon the position of Shaykh Al-Albaanee:

quote:
QUESTIONER: "We have heard that you said - O Shaikh - that it is permissible to enter into Parliamentary Elections, but with conditions?!"

SHAYKH AL-ALBAANEE: "NO IT IS NOT PERMISSIBLE! These conditions - when there are any - are purely theoretical and speculative, and not knowledge-based. So do you remember the conditions that I stated?"

QUESTIONER: "The first is that a person must protect his ownself (i.e. protect his religion)."

SHAYKH AL-ALBAANEE: "And is this possible?"

QUESTIONER: "I have never done it [so I would not know]."

SHAYKH AL-ALBAANEE: "And if Allaah wills you will NEVER do it! It is not possible to meet these conditions. And if we observe many of the people who at the beginning of their lives - we could see from their appearance, from their clothes, from their beards - and then when they entered Parliament, then their appearance changed! And after that they started justifying it... And likewise we would see people entering the Parliament with Islamic Arabic clothing and the after some days, they changed their clothing!! So is this an evidence and indication of corruption or rectification?!"

QUESTIONER: "Shaikh, I mean the brothers in Algeria, and their work there and their entry into the poloitical arena?"

SHAYKH AL-ALBAANEE: "WE DO NOT ADVISE THIS! We do not advise political work these days in any of the Islamic countries..."


(Tape: "Silsilatul-Hudaa wan-Noor" (1/352))

The fact is and still remains that the Markazi Jamiat Ahle-Hadith have NEVER been upon the positions of the scholars in these affairs (except maybe the Ikhwaani 'Abdur-Rahmaan 'Abdul-Khaaliq) nor have they previously claimed that. The Jamiat invents it's own political machinations and policies, and to claim otherwise now is an insult to those great scholars, may Allaah's mercy be upon them. The fatawa of the Scholars do not and never have supported the political activities of the Jamiat.

__________________________________________________________
[url=http://www.salaf.com/][/url]

ekbal.hussain
02-12-2007 @ 9:25 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Abu Abdullah Ekbal Hussain bin Siraj (London, UK)
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Dec 2002
          
"What if some of the Scholars have permitted voting in Elections?"


Read this Excellent Response from Shaykh Muhammad ibn Abdullah al-Imaam:

http://sunnahpublishing.net/modules/Manhaj/intikhaabaat.pdf

Shaykh Muhammad al-Imaam - a well-known student of Shaykh Muqbil and one of the eminent Shaykhs of Yemen - answers a doubt of the hizbiyyeen who attempt to use limited fataawaa of the major Scholars of our time about voting in elections to justify their own agenda of making democratic elections a manhaj for victory.

quote:

So with regards to the fatwaa of these Scholars, then it is restricted by the principles of the Sharee?ah. From these principles is bringing about the greater good, or preventing the greater evil by allowing the lesser of the two. This must occur in conformity with the rest of the rules of this principle. However, the callers to elections do not adhere to these rules...


quote:

It is a must that the expected benefit be real, not a delusion. So we do not allow a real harm in order to try to bring about an imaginary benefit. So if the democratic system were serving Islaam and its Sharee?ah with a real service, then it would have succeeded in Egypt, or Syria, or Algeria, or Pakistan, or Turkey, or any country in the world for the last sixty years.


quote:

And it is well known that from amongst the harms of democracy is destroying the basis of al-walaa? wal-baraa? (allegiance and enmity) based upon the Religion and watering down the clarity of ?aqeedah in order to win over the hearts, and then to eventually win over the voices, and then to eventually win over the parliamentary seats.  Whosoever knows this, then it is not for him to say that entering into such positions is the lesser of two harms.  Rather, the opposite is correct. And if we concede that both positions are equal here, then removing the harm takes precedence over bringing about benefit.


quote:

As for the people of the truth, then they know that the path of democracy and the pluralism of hizbiyyah does not increase the Ummah, except in weakness....


Also read what Imaam al-Albaani (rahimahullah) said about elections:

http://sunnahpublishing.net/modules/Manhaj/albaaneevoting1.pdf

The muhaddith of our times, Imaam al-Albaanee thoroughly defeats the misguided notion held by some Muslims that participating in democratic elections is the methodology the Muslims must adopt to attain victory.  He also clarifies the misgiving that the parliamentary process has any resemblance to the shooraa in Islaam.  Lastly, he clarifies that elections and voting as means do not have any basis within any madhhab from amongst the madhaahib of Islaam and that they are pure concoctions of the disbelievers.

This message was edited by ekbal.hussain on 2-13-07 @ 7:00 AM

spubs.com
02-18-2007 @ 5:54 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Administrator
Posts: 846
Joined: Sep 2002
          


WHO IS GIVING FATAWAA AND RULINGS BEYOND THEIR LEVEL?

Below is a quote from the 'Markazi Jamiat Ahle-Hadith UK' and Green Lane Mosque website:

quote:
Islamic Judiciary Board (IJB)

The Islamic Judiciary Board is based in the offices of the Masjid and deals with matrimonial issues as well as providing general Islamic advice and fataawa.

The matrimonial services that IJB offers are conducting the marriage ceremony in accordance with the Islamic Sharia as well as taking on cases of divorce/khula. For further information please contact 0121 0000000


Based on the history of this organisation and clear opposition in many areas to the Sunnah and Salafiyyah - they should be from those to be avoided when seeking fatawa, as is clear from all the evidences we have provided above. They are in no knowledge-based position to be issuing fatawa.



__________________________________________________________


awzan.ibn.badr
02-25-2007 @ 9:56 AM    Notify Admin about this post
aboo 'ubayd Ozan ibn Bedir (London U.K.)
Member
Posts: 71
Joined: Mar 2003
          


Shaikh Muqbils Speech on Voting, Elections and Democracy

Translated and compiled by: Abu Yusuf, Sagheer Ibn Abdir-Rasheed Al-Kashmeeree

quote:
The following are excerpts from the works and the speech of the great scholar, Sheikh Muqbil Bin Haadee (may Allah have mercy on him), regarding voting, elections and democracy. In recent times, these aforementioned issues have begun to be discussed with a lot more intensity amongst those who claim adherence to the way of the Salaf.

It is hoped that the speech of this great scholar will help to clear up so much of the confusion which abounds from different quarters and which makes the ordinary people fall into the trap of blindly following the scholars because of desire, hatred for others and misguided zeal for the betterment of the Islam and the Muslims.

I have also decided to translate these sections of the Sheikh's speech because as of recently, there seems to be a trend of just putting up one side of the argument (which is incidentally built upon incomplete questions regarding the situation of the Muslims in the west) by certain brothers at certain websites, and ignoring the arguments of the other side and of this noble scholar in particular.

I say that is which is occurring when brothers translate many other beneficial parts of the above mentioned books and post them on their website, but then conveniently forget the massive chunks related to voting, elections and democracy from the same books !!!!  

As the reader will see inshaa'allah, the Sheikh has furnished his speech with ample proof to demonstrate the fallacy of taking part in voting, elections and democracy.

May Allah, The Mighty and The Magnificent, give us all the sincerity to accept the truth no matter how bitter it is and save us from the destructive ways of Shaytaan and his allies. Aameen.


Attached FileMuqbil_Elections.pdf (158 Kbytes)

spubs.com
02-26-2007 @ 5:47 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Administrator
Posts: 846
Joined: Sep 2002
          


'LORD NAZIR', A KEY SPEAKER FOR MARKAZI JAMIAT AHLE-HADITH UK STATES "NIQAAB IS PURELY CULTURAL"!!

'Lord' Nazir Ahmed has always been seen by the Markazi Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith as one of their own, who has 'made it' into the political arena. They always state and claim that he is a good ahle-hadith person who aids Islaam and the Muslims and is a protector of the rights of Muslims in the UK.

Green Lane Mosque, the headquarters of Jamiat Ahle-Hadith UK, have invited year after year, conference after conference, even after event, as a speaker and lecturer.

So now Nazir Ahmed has taken yet another step in misrepresenting Islaam:

quote:
"The veil is now a mark of separation, segregation and defiance against mainstream British culture.

"But there's nothing in the Koran to say that the wearing of a niqab is desirable, let alone compulsory. It's purely cultural. It's an identity thing which has been misinterpreted.."

http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=19692
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/article2290058.ece


This is shear and utter ignorance. It reminds us of the following beautiful narration:

quote:
Narrated Alqamah that 'Abdullaah Ibn Mas'ood said:

"Allaah curses those women who practice tatooing and those who get themselves tatooed, and those women who get their hair removed from their eyebrows..."

His saying reached a lady from the tribe of Asad, called Umm Ya'qoob came to the Companion, Abdullaah Ibn Mas'ood and said:

"I have come to know that you have cursed so and so women?" He replied, "Why should I not curse those whom Allaah's Messenger has cursed and who are cursed in Allaah' Book!"

Umm Ya'qoob said: "I have read the whole Qur'aan, but I did not find in it what you say." He said: "If you have indeed read it, you would have found it. Did you not read:

{{And whatever the Messenger gives you, take it. And whatever he forbids he forbids you, abstain from it.}} [Qur'aan 59:7]"

[Saheeh al-Bukhaaree 6/4886]


The Scholars state that the niqaab is from Islaam, and the hadeeth are ample in that regard. The only matter of difference is whether it is obligatory or recommended without obligation.

So is it that Nazir Ahmed only accepts what he finds in the Qur'aan, and leaves off the Sunnah and the statements of the Prophet? Or is that he is ignorant, feigning knowledge?

So when will the defenders of the Markazi Jamiat Ahl-e-Hadith realise the harm that the Jamiat and its associates are doing to the da'wah?

And note, O reader, that our exposition of this Jamiat is in no way support for the evil attributes of the Soofees as is well known. Indeed our advice to and correction of the Jamiat, pre-dates the soofee and jamiat battle of media (i.e. the "Undercover Mosques" program) by over a decade! We were speaking against the innovated ideology of the Soofees when the Jamiat was inviting them to Green Lane mosque and giving them platforms to speak upon and praising the Soofees openly on public radio. So maybe that is another lesson to Jamiat, but a lesson alas unheeded!

__________________________________________________________


ekbal.hussain
03-06-2007 @ 4:41 PM    Notify Admin about this post
Abu Abdullah Ekbal Hussain bin Siraj (London, UK)
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Dec 2002
          
More of Imaam Al-Albani's Speech regarding the harms of entering into Parliamentary Elections:

http://www.salafyoun.com/showthread.php?t=393

spubs.com
08-25-2007 @ 10:22 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Administrator
Posts: 846
Joined: Sep 2002
          


SHAIKH 'UBAID WARNS AGAINST CO-OPERATION WITH MARKAZ JAM'IYAH AHLUL-HADITH UK AND ITS HEAD ABDUL-HADI OMARI

Ash-Shaikh al-Allaamah 'Ubaid al-Jaabiree stated:


"Know that I do not allow co-operation with any political or partisan jamaa'ah such as 'Nadwatul-Mujaahideen' of Kerala (in India), rather I warn against them, due to the fact that it is established with me that they are not upon the Sunnah. And from the political groups (al-jama'aat as-siyaasiyah) which I see should not be co-operated with or to come under their banner is the Jama'aah Ahlul-Hadith in Birmingham, Britain, whose head is 'Abdul-Haadi al-'Omari - and the Jam'iyyatul-Irshaad in Indonesia, the one established by Ahmad Al-Sarkati..."

Saturday, 18th Rabee' Al-Akhir, 1428



__________________________________________________________


Abu.Habibah.Raashid
06-16-2008 @ 9:10 PM    Notify Admin about this post
unspecified unspecified (Birmingham, UK)
Member
Posts: 33
Joined: Sep 2006
          
Exposing Abdul-Hadee Al-Umaree and His Jamiat.

Abdul-Hadee Al-Umaree (Ameer of the 'Jamiat') delivered an Urdu lecture on a Radio Station in Birmingham, UK, in the month of Ramadaan. This program reaches out to tens and thousands of Muslims! He states that Ahmad Ridhaa Brelewee (the one who called openly to major Shirk and major Kufr), Shabeer Ahmad Uthmaanee Ad-Deobandee, Syed Abul-Aala Mawdoodee are great scholars who have provided a great service to Islaam - he praises them over and over again, to the point of exageration! Not even mentioning a single point of criticism of them or their sects!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIVn_nx1wV0

Those who have an atom's weight of justice from the defenders of this Jam'iyyah should hasten to repent, rectify!





Abu.Lubaynah
02-26-2010 @ 7:41 AM    Notify Admin about this post
Abu Lubaynah Abdul Ghanee ibn Michael Goodchild Al-Guyaanee (Birmingham, UK)
Member
Posts: 204
Joined: Sep 2008
          
Assalaamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa baarakaatuh

Shaykh Ubayd Al-Jaabaree speaks concerning Jamiat
Ahle-Hadith Birmingham UK (Green Lane Masjid):


Translated into english.

Link:

http://en.miraath.net/content/cooperating-jama%E2%80%99-al-hadeeth-birmingham


When a man knows his ownself, speech of the people is of no benefit to him!

PAGE: 1 2 3





SalafiPublications.Com
TawhidFirst | Aqidah | AboveTheThrone | Asharis
Madkhalis | Takfiris | Maturidis | Dajjaal
Islam Against Extremism | Manhaj
Ibn Taymiyyah | Bidah
Genitive Case in Arabic Grammar


main page | contact us
Copyright © 2001 - SalafiTalk.Net
Madinah Dates Gold Silver Investments