Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Sep 2002
|
Bismillaahir-Rahmaanir-Raheem
Alhamdulillaah, was-Salaatu was-Salaamu ?ala Rasoolillaah, wa ?ala Aalihi wa Sahbihi Ajma?een.
Ammaa Ba?d
Indeed, this whole fitnah with al-Ma?ribee, QSS, 'Abdul-Mun'im Burkhees al-Leebee an-Nammaam al-Kadhdhaab al-Hizbee, ?Abdul-Qaadir al-Affaak, Zaahid Rashid al-Kadhdhaab al-Mumayyi', Abu Usaamah and Brixton exonerates those clear Salafi organizations that remained firm throughout the years. In particular, I would like to remind ourselves that Salafi Publications and then TROID have weathered all the storms and have always been there to present the Haqq to the people.
Those previously mentioned individuals and organizations (QSS etc.) had always been affected by the Sulaymaanee Da?wee principles. That is why they would always follow up any mention of Salafi Publications and TROID with criticism, and would be quick in cooperating with those who were opposed to Salafi Publications and TROID.
The hearts of these two poles were not united, because in reality, these Hizbee organizations and individuals were not establishing their Da?wah upon the same principles as those who were sticking closely to the Kibaar and their clear proofs. They were trying to establish a vast Manhaj that would be suitable for Ahlus-Sunnah and the Ummah. Understood in this vast Manhaj was the concept of correcting the mistakes of the Mukhaalifeen without destroying the people, as open refutation of them was not seen as a Rahmah for them and the Ummah, but as a form of destruction. This was the Asl of ikhtilaaf between the Salafees and those who were wearing the cloak of Salafiyyah.
Hence, this fitnah has separated those who were upon the principles of Ahlul-Hadeeth and those who were only playing. It has also separated those who were seeking a middle way, and those who were not willing to compromise from the beginning.
Those from amongst the du?aat who have been advised and accepted the statements of the Kibaar over the Sighaar differ in merit. There are amongst them those who immediately accepted the correct position. There were also some who responded, but took too long to do so. When they were considerately advised by their brothers, they reacted in an inappropriate manner. So what stops them from going to these brothers and thanking them, making amends and uniting the word amongst the Salafis?
There are also those like ?Abdul-Haqq Baker who has yet to come out and aid the Haqq and make Tawbah from the calamities which have arisen from what his own hands have brought forth. It should be known that he is at the head of those who have been consistently digging away at the clear Salafees while befriending anyone who claims Salafiyyah and shares his Manhaj of Tamyee? (liquefying the Manhaj) and holding grudges. This is so even though they have been patient with him over the years and advised him time and time again, only to see him try to satisfy all sides, wobbling about in various directions. And the door of conditional Tawbah is open to all.
Therefore, those who remained firm throughout have their merit, and they deserve to be cooperated with and aided so long as they are upon that goodness.
Wallaahu A?lam, wa Sallallaahu wa Sallam ?ala Nabeenaa Muhammad, wa ?ala Aalihi wa Sahbihi Ajma?een.
Abu Ibraheem Haneef
|
|
haneef.al-canadee
18-10-2002 @ 12:00 AM
