Member
Posts: 67
Joined: Aug 2002
|
Abdul-Qadir Said only a few weeks ago:
"Like I said, Shaykh Ubayd was lied to because, there is nothing in the contract (i.e. contract of Brixton) that contains hizbiyyah, Shaykh Ubayd said in his fatwaa that all the affairs of Salafiyyah were to return to the two Mashayikh, but that is not true, that is not in the contract, what it does say is that the affairs of organisation and administration should return back to the two mashaykh, when we can't agree, so how this was misinterpreted to the Shaykh, then Allaahu Taa'aalaa a'lam"
Abu Ibraaheem said:
Is this what you think Shaykh ?Ubayd was lied to about, O Lutonian Liar?! Or is it that we should call you the Lutonian Muqallid, as you are a blind follower of al-Ma?ribee and the Sulaymaanee Manhaj of Tamyee? (melting and accommodating everyone into the Da?wah)?
It is most unfortunate that those two Shaykhs who were mentioned in this contract did not free themselves from its obvious baatil nature and open hizbiyyah. Verily, in that is a sign for people of intellect!
Consider, yaa ?Abdal-Qaadir, O you Mumaayi? (melter/accommodator), that these points are not limited to the fact that ?the affairs of organisation and administration should return back to the two mashaykh, when we can't agree?. Even if it had been, that is still a principle of Hizbiyyah. So either way, you are making harb (war) against the Kibaar and are exposing yourself as the Safeeh (fool) and Affaak (lying scandalmonger) that they have termed you. We didn?t expose you, you exposed yourself.
Here are the points from al-Ma?ribee?s contract:
"5. If they differ then they must all refer their affair to the two shaykhs (name of the Shaykhs)... since they are the two known to me who know best about the da'wah in this country and the state of its people."
And also:
"6. No one from either of the two sides may go to another scholar who is ignorant of the situation here.... Rather referring back to other scholars will only be for the two aforementioned shaykhs.."
And also:
"11. ... with regard to the present situation and future results, and this is referred back to the two shaykh alone - either they order something from that, otherwise it will not be, and it is binding upon everyone that they submit to what the two of them say, and not to open the door to all and sundry."
"12. Yearly da'wah conferences and other than them in Britain will be unified. The shaikhs who will take part will be chosen after consulting the two shaikhs... unless the two shaikhs hold some view in that regard - since they know best about whether it will be beneficial for so-and-so to be allowed to take part in the affair or not."
"17. Whoever takes the advice of the two shaikhs regarding hajr (boycotting) a certain person, or openly rebuking him - then others may not criticise them for this.."
"27. Whoever opposes what is contained in this judgement, then he is opposing what I hold to be what will draw the brothers closer together in Britain and will unite them together. So in such a case, then his affair will be referred back to the two shaikhs to decide what should be done about him according to the sharee'ah; even if that should result in a fatwa being given that he be boycotted and that none of the Salafis of this country should turn to him..."
Source of the contract points: Contract In Brixton 1999 (Part 2) SP Forum.
This message was edited by Sulaifi on 9-17-02 @ 10:41 AM
|
|
Sulaifi
17-09-2002 @ 12:00 AM
